Richardson, TX
Home MenuPhoto Contest Judging Criteria
Architecture Cityscape “Dallas Skyline Sunrise Glows” Raja Ganduri (Amateur)
It All Makes a Difference! |
Remember the judges are watching out for these...
Presentation
You don’t get a second chance for a good first impression. Does your image meet all entry requirements?
Is the photograph clean and within size limits? Is the foam core mounting board white and clean with smooth edges? Is it the proper 16”x 20” size?
Composition/Arrangement
Are the objects in the photo arranged in a meaningful, pleasing manner or are they “haphazard”? Did the photographer use the best angle or otherwise interesting perspective?
Technical Quality
Is the photograph in focus? If not, does it appear to be an intentional effect to enhance the image in some “artistic” way? Watch for proper exposure, shutter speed, white balance, and depth of field.
On the Editing
General, basic edits are permitted and expected. These include edits such as exposure adjustments, shadow and highlight recovery, hdr, color balance and tint correction, cropping, sharpening, contrast and black levels. These do not need disclosure. Advanced editing, at the proficient level, such as layering, composites, cloning and healing tools, masking, warping and filters are also permitted but should be disclosed. Undisclosed advanced edits could lead to lowered ranking at judges discretion.
Relevancy to Category Topic
Is the photo an obvious illustration of the category in which it is entered? Is the category chosen appropriate for the image’s artistic treatment?
Lighting
Did the photographer pay thoughtful attention to proper lighting of the subject matter? Do any extremes of darkness or brightness lend to or detract from the image content?
Judge’s Tip: “Watch those Hot Spots!”
Creativity/Artistic Merit/Originality
Do all the elements come together with the photographer showing some creative thought or original idea in the making of this image? Was the subject matter selected pictured in a unique way or was something common shown from a non-traditional point-of-view?
Impact
Is there an effectiveness of visual communication between photographer and viewer? Is it eye-catching?
|
|
|
|